Flipkart ads Live account · Jun–Aug

Stationery on Flipkart: spend scaled 5.7x, sales up 127%.

Spend scaled 5.7x in three months to capture more inventory. Efficiency softened as expected with that scale, but total sales still grew well ahead of it.

5.7x
Spend scaled
7.68x
TROI (Aug)
+127%
Sales growth
Category
Stationery
Marketplace
Flipkart ads
Window
Live account · Jun–Aug
Scope
Flipkart Ads
The starting point

The situation

This is a live Flipkart Ads account in the Stationery category, reported over June to August. The goal was to capture more inventory opportunity on Flipkart, which meant scaling spend quickly.

We are upfront that efficiency softened as spend grew. This case is about whether the trade was worth it.

The work

What we did

  1. A staged increase in budgets across the three-month window rather than a single jump.
  2. Campaign architecture and targeting reviewed to put the extra spend behind products with stock and demand.
  3. Placement and budget pacing monitored so spend followed demand instead of running ahead of it.
  4. Seller-level reporting reviewed weekly, with actions agreed and tracked.
The numbers

Reading the results

Spend scaled 5.7x

Ad spend grew to 5.7 times its starting level over three months. That is a very large increase and a very different account at the end.

TROI 7.68x (Aug)

Flipkart's total return on ad investment was 7.68x in August. TROI is Flipkart's measure and is not directly comparable to Amazon's ROAS.

Sales growth +127%

Total sales more than doubled, up 127%. Sales grew less than spend did, which is why return per rupee softened.

What happened

The outcome

Efficiency softened as expected with that scale, but total sales still grew well ahead of what the account started with.

This is a scale-first outcome: it makes sense where there is stock, demand and margin to support it, and less sense where margins are thin. Whether it is the right trade depends on what the account is trying to achieve.

Takeaways

What we took from it

  • Decide in advance whether you are optimising for efficiency or for scale, because you rarely get both at once.
  • Large scaling needs inventory depth. Spend behind products that run out is wasted.
  • Compare Flipkart figures to Flipkart figures; do not read TROI as ROAS.

What happens next. We are now looking at which of the added spend is most efficient to keep, and where the account can recover some return without giving up the new level of sales.

Anonymised by category, not brand — client privacy. Figures are the account's reported metrics for the window shown. Not a forecast or a guarantee of results.

Learn the metrics

Want to understand these numbers?

These short guides explain the terms and decisions behind this account.

More accounts

Other case studies.

Live account · Jun–AugAmazon ads

Clothing

Ad spend scaled aggressively while ACOS held steady — paid growth pulled organic sales up with it instead of cannibalising it.

+119%
Spend scaled
4.02x
ROAS (Aug)
+91%
Sales growth
Read full case study
Live account · May–AugAmazon ads

Stationery

ACOS wobbled through a mid-year test before settling back down, while TACOS and daily run rate improved through the same window.

+44%
Spend scaled
4.22x
ROAS (Aug)
+55%
Sales growth
Read full case study
Ads-metrics scope · Dec–FebAmazon ads

Home Decor

A larger portfolio brand where Stegos's mandate is ads efficiency only, not overall business growth. Rising ACOS here is informing the current optimisation plan.

+15%
Ad spend
22.8%
ACOS (Feb)
Ads-only
Scope
Read full case study

← All case studies

Want your own account read this way?

The free audit maps spend, structure and catalogue health, and flags where efficiency is leaking.